Jane Norris                                                                                                    23.7.02

 

 

 

THE NORTH CIRCULAR (406) AS A DELEUZIAN ROUTE

 

 

 

 

The North Circular is by its very positioning an ambiguous road, its beginning and end mysteriously transforming at some point into its opposite partner the South Circular. This may reveal something of the binary nature of town planners, who have clearly abandoned the spatial qualities of the four points of the compass opting instead for the top / bottom opposites of North and South as if London were a flat piece of paper that could be folded neatly in half. The result of this is the strange experience of falling round the sides of London even before navigating the complexities of the 406 itself. The route’s vague geography relies on a strange compass relationship to the rest of London’s roads lending the North Circular a Deleuzian sense of fluid and ‘virtual’ positioning. In rejecting the numerical beginning of motorways (Junction 1, etc…) it side steps identification at a static mathematical point and to use Deleuze’s description in chapter 2 of the ‘The Fold’: ‘It is not exactly a point but a place, a position, a site, a “linear focus,” a line emanating from lines.’[1]

 

One could develop this analogy further by viewing the North Circular as an ‘active spontaneous line’ as described by Klee[2] where its route, marked on a map is articulated by action, or as Leibniz states, describing the inherent movement contained in any apparently straight line: ‘ There can never be a straight line without curves intermingled’[3] This is certainly true of a rush hour drive round the North Circular where even proceeding along a straight dual carriageway requires the minute curves of constant lane changing in order to make any progress at all.

 

The North Circular acts as a ‘virtual road’ in the sense that it is made up of a number of smaller local roads assigned this performative role. Presumably should the need arise due to building development, new roads could be elected to ‘be the North Circular’, fulfilling the same task of guiding a flow of constant traffic around an agreed sense of perimeter. This enables the ‘A 406’ – clearly marked on the surface of the road, to escape a static sense of ‘objectness’, transforming it into more of a Deleuzian ‘objectile’ (related to projectile) … ‘no longer defined by an essential form, but reach(ing) a pure functionality…where the object assumes a place in a continuum by variation …- it becomes an event’[4]. It is almost as if the North Circular is a migratory path selected by mass experience through a variety of needs bringing into place a continuum route that is named belatedly by planners.

 

The ‘event’ or physical experience of traveling round the North Circular in a car can perhaps offer Deleuze’s ‘point of view’ through the windscreen as a way of perceiving the ever moving, transforming ‘objectile’ of the A 406 route. A static single viewpoint or even series of ‘as they are happening’ viewpoints does not equip the driver to anticipate, react and navigate the spatial flow of both traffic and route. Rather a driver that operates treating the immediate view and necessary positional adjustments on the road in direct relation to the movement and flow of the journey as a whole would probably be more successful – ‘What can be apprehended from one point of view is therefore neither a determined street nor a relation that might be determined with other streets, which are constants, but the variety of all possible connections between the course of a given street and that of another’[5]. London drivers become very adept I suspect at constantly holding in mind the variety of all possible connections, should a sudden abandonment of chosen route be required, a Deleuzian skill heightened by frequent traffic jams. What is seen though the windscreen therefore is: ‘…what comes to the point of view, or rather what remains in the point of view’[6] at any moment in the flow of traffic. In this way a glance, photograph or video still of any particular part of the road is constructed from the total surrounding area and as the product of this, holds within it the sense of movement or potential of the whole journey.

 

In many ways the North Circular ‘envelopes’ the contours of the north of London, holding within it the folds of junctions, slip roads and underpasses, stretching out across a multiplicity of areas and access roads, causing planners to develop series of traffic lights to accommodate its integral flow and movement. Perhaps it acts as the container or ‘soul’ of London and as such is inseparable from the roads it folds into itself. Maybe junctions act as ‘points of opportunity’, each junction containing within it the potential of traveling the whole of London yet each ‘expressing more clearly a small region of the world, a “subdivision”, a borough of the city, a finite sequence’[7] It is at these multi layered crossing points that an infinite number of drivers intersect across an infinite series of different routes, the individual route sequence in every driver, overlapping the destination potential at every traffic lights or roundabout. Deleuze, in discussing individuality suggests that there is an infinity of souls and an infinity of points of view – or in this context ‘journeys’, and what defines difference is the seriality or the particular order of junctions in the route of the journey: ‘Each (driver) grasps or includes it in a different order and from the standpoint of a different borough.’[8] This therefore gives each individual their particular windscreen ‘point of view’ in their unique series or journey.

 

The continual envelopment and extension through dynamic interaction is replicated in the internal landscape of the driver, in the soul or ‘Monad’ – ‘a state of One that envelopes a multiplicity, this multiplicity developing the One.’ This soul or subject is what occupies ‘the point of view’ and has the function of ‘enveloping and developing’ so every fold or layer of the journey; every sideways spatial adjustment or loop through an underpass is folded into the drivers experience becoming part of the driver. This may explain the common ‘driving amnesia’ experienced when repeatedly taking the same route. Often drivers will comment on no memory of having driven to work except for the last few seconds of arriving. The external landscape having been so folded into the internal one in the manner of coloring into pastry, that it has become an integral part of the structure of seeing and reacting.

 

In the same way that the route is folded into the driver, the driver is the articulation of the North Circular – bringing it into being by performing the event of the journey. The driver and the route forming a double loop as route becomes event and driver becomes or embodies route – a mobius strip.

 

To conclude, by joining the final thought to the first one and completing the circle… the ambiguity of having no clear beginning or end underlines this infinity of possibilities: ‘The entire world (North Circular) is the infinite curve that touches at an infinity of points, an infinity of curves … and the entire world (North Circular) is enclosed in the soul (- that navigates it)’[9].  In traveling this unfolding road, what has opened up is a multi-layered labyrinth of possibilities, coinciding and gliding over one another in flows of never to be repeated momentary connections.

 

 

 



[1] Deleuze G The Fold London, Athlone Press 1993 p19

[2] Klee P Pedagogical Sketchbook London Faber & Faber 1953 p16

[3] Liebniz.g.w  Theodicy sec. 346

 

[4] p 19

[5] p 24

[6] p 19

[7] p 25.